DemCast

Making masks for your friends and family! Nylons to the rescue, once again.

Action update on making your homemade masks more effective.

In the 1940’s, American women took to drawing lines up the back of their legs to mimic the look of nylons, as the real product was rationed to produce nylon parachutes, flak jackets, cords and rope.

Nylons are once again being called to the front, the front of our faces, that is. Researchers at Northeastern University have found that adding an outer layer made from nylon stockings to a homemade face covering can boost its ability to filter out small particles in the air by creating a tighter seal between the mask and the wearer’s face. In some cases, that extra nylon layer helped homemade cloth masks match or exceed the filtering capability of medical-grade surgical masks.” (npr)

Details:

Caveats:

Action update on making masks for health care facilities.

If you are donating masks to an specific institution – it is ESSENTIAL TO ASKwhat requirements they have. Material type? Nose wire? Filter pocket? Length of ties? Hospitals are rejecting all kinds of homemade PPE that don’t comply with their needs.

Ventura County needs handmade masks for front line professionals to cover their N95 masks. They have a very organized campaign for volunteer involvement and all donations must comply with specifications from their infection control staff. They have chosen this elastic-free mask type for its sturdy and comfortable design and ability to survive 5 months of daily washing in an autoclave, where elastic would melt. Filter pockets and nose wires are not accepted.  They  have also designed a gown that can be made by community volunteers. Click the links to sign up for the mask or gown brigade, OR BOTH!

Other hospitals need single-use masks to hand out to patients in waiting rooms to prevent the spread of COVID-19. That kind of mask may use elastic ear loops because they are easier for patients to use.

Masks for you, your friends and family – some caveats first.

NO-Sew options

We will update as new information come in. We’ve included a variety to allow for skill sets and equipment, as not every one has a sewing machine. Online sources suggest twist ties and paper clips as “wires” for nose bridges and using rubber bands for elastic. Though nowhere near as effective as the nano-technology of commercial masks, the droplet protection afforded by cloth masks increases with the fineness of the cloth used, the number of layers, and attention to fit.

There are additional options for no-sew masks  here.

Option 1 – the Bandana 

Option 2 – the Bandana, CDC style

en español

Needs a 20″ x 20″ bandana or cloth napkin, rubber bands or hair ties, and a coffee filter.

Option 3 – paper toweling /nose wire/face shield 

This article and video is from Hong Kong. Paper is not the most effective choice. (See “Deeper Dive” below)

Option 4 – coffee filters/no pocket/nose wire

Here’s a video on making face masks from coffee filters. There are no studies showing the efficacy of coffee filters for this purpose. They may just keep one from touching one’s face.

Option 5 – HEPA vacuum bag 

Indiana University professor Jiangmei Wu demonstrates how to create a face mask using origami. Patterns for adult and children here.

Option 6 – CDC Quick Cut T-shirt Face covering 

en español

Sewing options 

Option 1 – CDC version

en español

Option 2 – Double-layer rectangle//nose wire/no pocket

This is a good video for beginning sewers.

Option 3 – Double or triple-layer rectangle//nose wire/no pocket

Faster version here.

Option4 – double-layer rectangle/pocket/no nose wire

Another solid rectangular option with pocket: Illustrated instructions from buttoncounter.com (scroll down towards the bottom) #buttoncountermask.

image

Option 5 – double-layer rectangle /no pocket/no nose wire

This is from Deaconess Healthcare. They are asking for community volunteers to make them for their hospital. Video and instruction sheet are here. (if you don’t use elastic, make top ties at least 16″ long.

Providence St. Joseph Health in Renton, WA, is also asking for volunteers who have sewing machines to pick up kits to create 100 masks each for hospital visitors who may be exhibiting signs of coronavirus.

Option 6 – Shaped rectangle with bounded edges and integral ties, no pocket

Instructions here. This is the option that our local hospital system is requesting.

Option 7 – double-layer rectangle/filter pocket/no nose wire/ties

This pattern and the method were recommended by the Belgian Federal Public Service for Public Health, based on a design byDr Chen Xiaoting, a Taiwanese anaesthetist

It has very clear written instructions and video below and starts with a single rectangle. It has pleats and a pocket for a replaceable filter material, approximately the same size of the face mask.

They suggest vacuum cleaner bags or carbon filters. The CDC recommends 8 layers of tshirt material which can be washed and reused.

Option 8 – double sided shaped, vertical seam/no nose wire/ no filter pocket

Download face full scale mask pattern here and instructions here.

Quote from source: “You actually have to be a decent seamstress to sew these, between 30 and 45 minutes… These are DROPLET protection masks–very good for community spread prevention if used properly (ie the wearer avoids innoculating their face by adjusting the mask with unwashed hands), but not suitable for ICU use or for taking specimen

Option 9 – double-sided shaped, vertical seam, but with nose wire and filter pocket

Ignore her reference to medical professionals using both sides without sterilization. Written instructions here.

Option 10 – double-sided shaped, vertical seam, ties.

Video and instructions here

Option 11 – Double-layer rectangle/filter pocket/nose wire

Deeper Dive

The options above are from the internet and physician friends. The stock of professional masks is dangerously low. Our medical professionals are worried that their need to stretch out the lifespan of protective equipment like masks and gloves could be putting patients at risk. They, along with their colleagues around the world, are searching for options and are sharing information on homemade solutions.

We’re not No. #1!

From this article

Why has it taken so long to ask the public to wear masks!

One of the offices Trump shut down, along with the White House Pandemic Response Team, was the White House Social and Behavioral Sciences Team, removing behavioral scientists who could have helped advise on exactly how to get people to actually follow instructions necessary to manage this crisis. Our current situation regarding mask usage is a case study in how NOT to communicate.

It’s no surprise that this whole campaign has backfired, as empty shelves and widespread price gouging will attest to. Supplies of a crucial type of respirator mask are dwindling fast, which could lead to multiple accidental infections of patients by health care professionals with no proper protective gear, or one trying to stretch the use of one beyond manufacturer recommendations.

Please leave the professional grade masks for the professionals!

Germany is joining South Korea and other countries in banning exports of medical masks and US stockpiles contain only 1% of the 3.5 billion masks that we are estimated to need. US mask makers and Chinese exporters cannot keep up with our demand. A medical supplier, Michael Einhorn said “We’re having to make tough decisions every day on who gets masks and who doesn’t. Do masks go to the suburban hospital or the 911 responders? It’s a huge responsibility, and we know we’re going to make some mistakes.

When should a non-medical professional wear a mask here and here.:

The one time you would want a mask is if you’re sick and you have to leave the house,” stated Dr. Perencevich. “If you have the flu or think you have COVID, that’s when you’d put on a mask to protect others. In your house, if you feel like you’re sick, you should wear a mask to protect your family members. If you are caring for someone with COVID in your home, it is wise to wear a mask when in close proximity to that person, who should also wear a mask, Dr. Perencevich said.” WHO added that there’s no evidence masks protect ordinary people going about their daily business. More important, handwashing and social distancing.

Why are N95 masks so effective?N95 masks are tighter fitting and thicker than surgical masks. While surgical masks can block only large-particle droplets, N95 masks filter out 95 percent of all airborne particles when used correctly. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommend that they be used only by people with infectious respiratory illness and health care workers who treat or otherwise come in contact with them. Even the best masks are effective only when used with proper hand-cleaning.

Why can’t we make more faster?: Masks are actually pretty complicated constructions and now there is now a global shortage of the “melt-blown” fabric required to make them. Melt-blown fabric is an extremely fine mesh of synthetic polymer fibers that forms the critical inner filtration layer of a mask, allowing the wearer to breath while reducing the inflow of possible infectious particles. “We’re talking about fibers where one filament has a diameter of less than one micron, so we are in the nano area,” said Markus Müller, the sales director at German company Reicofil, a major provider of melt-blown machine lines.

The machines that make the fabric costing upward of 3.8 million euros ($4.23 million) and are themselves are not easy to make because of the exacting precision required, says Müller. Reicofil’s Müller says he gets more than four dozen requests a day, mainly from China, to buy melt-blown fabric and production lines but has to turn nearly all of them away as making a single machine line takes at least five to six months.

China, the major manufacturer of the fabric, is retooling other types of factories to make masks, and is starting ten new melt-blown production lines. “Before the outbreak, the going price for one ton of melt-blown fabric in China was under 6,000 dollars a ton. But now, it’s about 60,000 dollars,” said a sales staff surnamed Guo at Xuzhong Guohong, a major supplier of melt-blown based in Hubei province, the center of virus outbreak in China. “The [shortage] issue is quite severe. Otherwise, why would the price be jacked up so high?”

Surgical masks offer less protection. They fit loosely around the nose and mouth, and fine, virus-laden airborne particles could be inhaled with unfiltered air around their edges. So a makeshift substitute like a bandanna or handkerchief that fits more loosely will filter out even fewer particles.

“Surgical masks provide less protection than N95 masks, and my guess is that bandannas would provide even less,” Rabinowitz said. Randomized studies that have tracked infection rates have found that surgical masks are just as effective as N95 masks at preventing the transmission of viruses, possibly because they prevent users from touching their face.

What about homemade masks? Would a bandana work?

If you want to make one, what material works best?

The Cambridge University experiments.

According to a studied performed at Cambridge University during the 2009 H1N1 flu pandemic, while surgical masks perform the best at capturing Bacillus atrophaeus bacteria (0.93-1.25 microns) and Bacteriophage MS virus (0.023 microns), vacuum cleaner bags, tea towels, and cotton T-shirts were not too far behind. The coronavirus is 0.1-0.2 microns, well within the range for the results of the tests.

The experimentThis study examined homemade masks as an alternative to commercial face masks. Several household materials were evaluated for the capacity to block bacterial and viral aerosols. Twenty-one healthy volunteers made their own face masks from cotton t-shirts; the masks were then tested for fit. The number of microorganisms isolated from coughs of healthy volunteers wearing their homemade mask, a surgical mask, or no mask was compared using several air-sampling techniques.(This information from smartairfilters.com)Surgical masks did best against 1-micron particles, stopping 97%. However, every material filtered out at least 50% of the particles.

But coronavirus is just 0.1 microns – ten times smaller. So the the scientists tested the materials against 0.02 micron Bacteriophage MS2 particles (5 times smaller than the coronavirus).  Homemade masks caught 7% fewer virus particles than larger ones and all materials except the scarf stopped at least 50% of the virus particles.

Are more layers better?A little. The double-layer pillowcase captured 1% more particles, and the double-layer shirt captured just 2% more particles. Yet the extra dish cloth layer boosted performance by 14%. That boost made the tea towel as effective as the surgical mask. However, that increase came at the cost of breathability, which is important if the user doesn’t want to pass out. Vacuum bags and double-layer tea towels are really hard to breath through.

The winner(s)? The Cambridge study concluded that cotton t-shirts and pillow cases were the best choices with the following caveats:

What about paper towels?
Not a good first choice…Tested against .3 microns, a single layer of paper towel captured 23% of particles and a double layer only 33%.

Missouri University of Science and Techology experiments

Yang Wang, an assistant professor of environmental engineering at Missouri University of Science and Technology, worked with his graduate students to study various combinations of layered materials — including both air filters and fabric. “You need something that is efficient for removing particles, but you also need to breathe,” said Dr. Wang, who last fall won an international award for aerosol research.

A typical surgical mask — made using a rectangular piece of pleated fabric with elastic ear loops — has a filtration efficiency ranging from 60 to 80% of particles as small as 0.3 microns, as opposed to a N95’s 95%.

Air Filters: Dr. Wang’s group tested two types of air filters, each with a MERV rating of 12 or higher, or a microparticle performance rating of 1900 or higher. NOTE: They can shed small particles that are dangerous to inhale and must be sandwiched between fabric layers.

Multiple fabric layer analysis: Dr. Wang’s group also found that when certain common fabrics were used, two layers offered far less protection than four layers. A 600 thread count pillow case captured just 22 percent of particles when doubled, but four layers captured nearly 60 percent. A thick woolen yarn scarf filtered 21 percent of particles in two layers, and 48.8 percent in four layers. A 100 percent cotton bandanna did the worst, capturing only 18.2 percent when doubled, and just 19.5 percent in four layers.

Coffee filter analysis: The group also tested Brew Rite and Natural Brew basket-style coffee filters, which, when stacked in three layers, showed 40 to 50 percent filtration efficiency — but they were less breathable than other options.

Vaccuum bags: In tests at Missouri University and University of Virginia, scientists found that vacuum bags removed between 60 percent and 87 percent of particles.

Reading:

Information about Sewing Masks in the time of COVID-19 (equilter.com)


DemCast is an advocacy-based 501(c)4 nonprofit. We have made the decision to build a media site free of outside influence. There are no ads. We do not get paid for clicks. If you appreciate our content, please consider a small monthly donation.


Exit mobile version